Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Determination of the taxable value for payment of service tax on reverse charge basis by the service recipient in respect of Goods Transport Agency (GTA) Services. The key points are: The value of taxable service is the consideration received by the service recipient towards the provision of service, as defined u/s 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. The value is not based on the invoice value but the gross amount paid by the service recipient to the service provider. The appellant determined the taxable value as the actual amount paid after adjusting rewards and penalties, which is correct as per Section 67. Rule 6(1)(x) cannot override Section 67 and is not applicable in this case. The Supreme Court in Intercontinental Consultants case held that the value of taxable service shall be the gross amount charged by the service provider. Therefore, the impugned order enhancing the taxable value is incorrect, and the appeal is allowed.
Determination of the taxable value for payment of service tax on reverse charge basis by the service recipient in respect of Goods Transport Agency (GTA) Services. The key points are: The value of taxable service is the consideration received by the service recipient towards the provision of service, as defined u/s 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. The value is not based on the invoice value but the gross amount paid by the service recipient to the service provider. The appellant determined the taxable value as the actual amount paid after adjusting rewards and penalties, which is correct as per Section 67. Rule 6(1)(x) cannot override Section 67 and is not applicable in this case. The Supreme Court in Intercontinental Consultants case held that the value of taxable service shall be the gross amount charged by the service provider. Therefore, the impugned order enhancing the taxable value is incorrect, and the appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.