Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The weighment activity carried out by the respondent appellant within the Navlakhi Port is not classifiable under the taxable category of Business Support Service as defined u/s 65(104c) of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 65(105)(zzzg). The weighbridge activity is an independent activity and cannot be classified as Business Support Service as the respondent is not supporting anyone's business. The demand raised in the Show Cause Notice does not survive as the category of demand itself is incorrect. The respondent has undertaken a statutory obligation by operating the weighbridge at the port. Such statutory obligations for smooth port operations cannot be taxed, as held in various judgments. The case of Food Corporation of India supports this view, where it was held that the weighment activity is not liable to service tax as it is not related to promotion, marketing, or sale of goods. Therefore, no interference is required in the impugned order of the lower authority, and the Revenue's appeal is dismissed.
The weighment activity carried out by the respondent appellant within the Navlakhi Port is not classifiable under the taxable category of Business Support Service as defined u/s 65(104c) of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 65(105)(zzzg). The weighbridge activity is an independent activity and cannot be classified as Business Support Service as the respondent is not supporting anyone's business. The demand raised in the Show Cause Notice does not survive as the category of demand itself is incorrect. The respondent has undertaken a statutory obligation by operating the weighbridge at the port. Such statutory obligations for smooth port operations cannot be taxed, as held in various judgments. The case of Food Corporation of India supports this view, where it was held that the weighment activity is not liable to service tax as it is not related to promotion, marketing, or sale of goods. Therefore, no interference is required in the impugned order of the lower authority, and the Revenue's appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.