Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Challenge to the State GST authorities demanding input tax credit availed by the petitioner along with interest and penalty for IGST paid on manpower supply services received during 2017-2022. It holds that the impugned show cause notices issued by the State GST authorities are illegal, arbitrary, and without jurisdiction, as the Central GST authorities had already initiated proceedings against the petitioner for the same subject matter, barring the State authorities from initiating proceedings u/s 6(2)(b) of the KGST Act, 2017. Consequently, the show cause notices are quashed. However, regarding the challenge to the show cause notice issued by the Central GST authorities, the petitioner is directed to submit a reply with relevant documents, which the authorities must consider in accordance with law, considering provisions like Section 13(3)(C) and Section 128A of the CGST Act, 2017, and Circular No. 211/5/24-GST. The petition is partially allowed.
Challenge to the State GST authorities demanding input tax credit availed by the petitioner along with interest and penalty for IGST paid on manpower supply services received during 2017-2022. It holds that the impugned show cause notices issued by the State GST authorities are illegal, arbitrary, and without jurisdiction, as the Central GST authorities had already initiated proceedings against the petitioner for the same subject matter, barring the State authorities from initiating proceedings u/s 6(2)(b) of the KGST Act, 2017. Consequently, the show cause notices are quashed. However, regarding the challenge to the show cause notice issued by the Central GST authorities, the petitioner is directed to submit a reply with relevant documents, which the authorities must consider in accordance with law, considering provisions like Section 13(3)(C) and Section 128A of the CGST Act, 2017, and Circular No. 211/5/24-GST. The petition is partially allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
