Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Breach of principles of natural justice occurred as the petitioner was unaware of proceedings due to non-communication by the consultant entrusted with GST compliances, resulting in an order confirming tax demand due to non-response. Considering the petitioner's inability to participate, an opportunity should be provided to contest the demand on merits. The order is set aside subject to verification of appropriation of Rs. 4,09,604.87 from the petitioner's bank account towards the demand. If not appropriated, the petitioner shall remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Breach of principles of natural justice occurred as the petitioner was unaware of proceedings due to non-communication by the consultant entrusted with GST compliances, resulting in an order confirming tax demand due to non-response. Considering the petitioner's inability to participate, an opportunity should be provided to contest the demand on merits. The order is set aside subject to verification of appropriation of Rs. 4,09,604.87 from the petitioner's bank account towards the demand. If not appropriated, the petitioner shall remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
