Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Rate of tax applicable on services provided by the applicant to Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (MJP) as part of the Jal Jeevan Mission, a Government of India mission. The services are classified as "Technical Consultancy for Project Development and Management support services" under SAC code 998399, attracting 18% GST (9% CGST & 9% SGST), unless exempted. For services provided before 01.01.2022, the exemption under Entry No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) is applicable. However, for services provided on or after 01.01.2022, the exemption is not available due to the omission of "Government Authorities" from the notification entry. The applicant's argument that services are provided to Central and State Governments, thus eligible for exemption, is rejected as speculative. The issue of whether MJP's appointment amounts to delegation of sovereign functions under the Constitution is deemed outside the purview of Section 97(2) of the GST Act.
Rate of tax applicable on services provided by the applicant to Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (MJP) as part of the Jal Jeevan Mission, a Government of India mission. The services are classified as "Technical Consultancy for Project Development and Management support services" under SAC code 998399, attracting 18% GST (9% CGST & 9% SGST), unless exempted. For services provided before 01.01.2022, the exemption under Entry No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) is applicable. However, for services provided on or after 01.01.2022, the exemption is not available due to the omission of "Government Authorities" from the notification entry. The applicant's argument that services are provided to Central and State Governments, thus eligible for exemption, is rejected as speculative. The issue of whether MJP's appointment amounts to delegation of sovereign functions under the Constitution is deemed outside the purview of Section 97(2) of the GST Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
