Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act to a deceased assessee is defective and cannot be continued against the legal representative, except in cases falling under clause (a) of sub-section (2) of Section 159 where proceedings were already initiated against the deceased before death. Mere informing the Assessing Officer about the assessee's death and requesting to drop proceedings does not constitute participation, and hence the defect cannot be cured u/s 292B. The legal representative's objection to the validity of notice from inception precludes applicability of the waiver principle. Issuing reassessment notice to a dead person is not a mere technical defect curable u/s 292B when the legal representative has consistently objected and not participated by filing returns.
Issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act to a deceased assessee is defective and cannot be continued against the legal representative, except in cases falling under clause (a) of sub-section (2) of Section 159 where proceedings were already initiated against the deceased before death. Mere informing the Assessing Officer about the assessee's death and requesting to drop proceedings does not constitute participation, and hence the defect cannot be cured u/s 292B. The legal representative's objection to the validity of notice from inception precludes applicability of the waiver principle. Issuing reassessment notice to a dead person is not a mere technical defect curable u/s 292B when the legal representative has consistently objected and not participated by filing returns.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
