Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Refund claim governed by unjust enrichment principles under Customs Act, 1962. Documentary evidence insufficient to rebut statutory presumption of passing on duty incidence. Flaws in orders: Non-consideration of assessee's evidence, improper recovery direction without following due process, misapplication of Supreme Court decision on different context. Certificate attesting transfer to receivables sufficient to negate unjust enrichment. Original authority's order restored, appellate order set aside for lack of validity.
Refund claim governed by unjust enrichment principles under Customs Act, 1962. Documentary evidence insufficient to rebut statutory presumption of passing on duty incidence. Flaws in orders: Non-consideration of assessee's evidence, improper recovery direction without following due process, misapplication of Supreme Court decision on different context. Certificate attesting transfer to receivables sufficient to negate unjust enrichment. Original authority's order restored, appellate order set aside for lack of validity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
