Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the Resolution Professional during the insolvency resolution process. Despite the claim being returned for re-submission, the appellant failed to take any action. The Resolution Plan was approved by the NCLT, extinguishing any remaining claims. Although the appellant's second claim was disbursed by the successful Resolution Applicant, the appellant did not object or challenge the Resolution Plan. The court held that once a Resolution Plan is approved, any remaining claims are deemed extinguished, as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Ghanashyam Mishra. The appellant's inaction resulted in the extinguishment of their claim, and the reliance on Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority was inapplicable, as the appellant did not challenge the Resolution Plan. The appeal was dismissed without any order on costs.
The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the Resolution Professional during the insolvency resolution process. Despite the claim being returned for re-submission, the appellant failed to take any action. The Resolution Plan was approved by the NCLT, extinguishing any remaining claims. Although the appellant's second claim was disbursed by the successful Resolution Applicant, the appellant did not object or challenge the Resolution Plan. The court held that once a Resolution Plan is approved, any remaining claims are deemed extinguished, as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Ghanashyam Mishra. The appellant's inaction resulted in the extinguishment of their claim, and the reliance on Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority was inapplicable, as the appellant did not challenge the Resolution Plan. The appeal was dismissed without any order on costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
