Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Amnesty scheme - Failure to file annual returns from financial year 2018-2019 till 01.04.2023, but filed before 31.08.2023. Justification for continuing notices for non-payment of late fees for belated GSTR-9C filed before 01.04.2023. Court held, relying on Anishia Chandrakanth v. Superintendent judgment, no justification for continuing notices for non-payment of late fees for belated GSTR-9C filed before 01.04.2023, when one-time amnesty commences. Ext.P3 set aside to extent seeking late fees for delay in filing GSTR-9C. However, petitioner not entitled to refund of late fees already paid over Rs. 10,000/-. Writ petition disposed of.
Amnesty scheme - Failure to file annual returns from financial year 2018-2019 till 01.04.2023, but filed before 31.08.2023. Justification for continuing notices for non-payment of late fees for belated GSTR-9C filed before 01.04.2023. Court held, relying on Anishia Chandrakanth v. Superintendent judgment, no justification for continuing notices for non-payment of late fees for belated GSTR-9C filed before 01.04.2023, when one-time amnesty commences. Ext.P3 set aside to extent seeking late fees for delay in filing GSTR-9C. However, petitioner not entitled to refund of late fees already paid over Rs. 10,000/-. Writ petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
