Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The assessing officer (AO) made additions to the assessee's income based on alleged bogus purchases and unexplained investments. The key points are: Addition of Rs. 209.82 lacs under 'others' category was rightly deleted by CIT(A) due to lack of proper findings. Out of total purchases, Rs. 5,11,56,526 were from 4 entirely bogus parties, while Rs. 5,35,20,325 were partially bogus from 15 parties. Since the assessee offered Rs. 5,53,25,652 as additional income, and considering 10% leakage on partially bogus purchases, the net addition sustained is Rs. 11,82,906. Disallowance of sub-contractor's expenses of Rs. 157 lacs was upheld, as the assessee admitted only Rs. 140.18 lacs, and the GST component was adjusted against output liability. Addition of unexplained investment u/s 69, based solely on loose excel sheets found during search, was deleted following the ITAT's decision in Kranti Impex case, which held that undated, unsigned papers cannot be the sole basis for determining undisclosed income.
The assessing officer (AO) made additions to the assessee's income based on alleged bogus purchases and unexplained investments. The key points are: Addition of Rs. 209.82 lacs under 'others' category was rightly deleted by CIT(A) due to lack of proper findings. Out of total purchases, Rs. 5,11,56,526 were from 4 entirely bogus parties, while Rs. 5,35,20,325 were partially bogus from 15 parties. Since the assessee offered Rs. 5,53,25,652 as additional income, and considering 10% leakage on partially bogus purchases, the net addition sustained is Rs. 11,82,906. Disallowance of sub-contractor's expenses of Rs. 157 lacs was upheld, as the assessee admitted only Rs. 140.18 lacs, and the GST component was adjusted against output liability. Addition of unexplained investment u/s 69, based solely on loose excel sheets found during search, was deleted following the ITAT's decision in Kranti Impex case, which held that undated, unsigned papers cannot be the sole basis for determining undisclosed income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
