Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance u/s 37 of interest paid on delayed payment of additional Customs Duty was challenged, contending that it was not penal in nature but compensation for delay in payment of taxes, hence allowable as revenue expenditure. Relying on Supreme Court rulings in Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Company Ltd., Lachmandas Mathuradas, and Karnataka High Court's decision in Mysore Electrical Industries Ltd., it was held that since interest is calculated at a certain percentage on a time basis for delayed payment of customs duty, it is compensatory in nature. The interest expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, neither personal nor capital, and cannot be treated as a penalty. Interest due to delayed payment of customs duty is deductible u/s 37 as an accretion to the main payment, not a penalty, and therefore allowable as a deduction. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Disallowance u/s 37 of interest paid on delayed payment of additional Customs Duty was challenged, contending that it was not penal in nature but compensation for delay in payment of taxes, hence allowable as revenue expenditure. Relying on Supreme Court rulings in Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Company Ltd., Lachmandas Mathuradas, and Karnataka High Court's decision in Mysore Electrical Industries Ltd., it was held that since interest is calculated at a certain percentage on a time basis for delayed payment of customs duty, it is compensatory in nature. The interest expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, neither personal nor capital, and cannot be treated as a penalty. Interest due to delayed payment of customs duty is deductible u/s 37 as an accretion to the main payment, not a penalty, and therefore allowable as a deduction. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.