Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return filed in response to a notice issued u/s 153A pursuant to a search u/s 132. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd., the Tribunal held that in unabated or concluded assessments, the assessee cannot make any fresh claim of deduction in the return filed u/s 153A, as the Assessing Officer cannot make additions without incriminating material found during the search. For abated assessments, the assessee can claim all deductions by filing the return within the timeline prescribed u/s 153A, failing which deductions cannot be claimed u/s 80A. Claiming deduction u/s 80IA(4) requires filing the return before the due date u/s 139(1) and furnishing the audit report u/s 44AB, as per Section 80IA(7). The Tribunal relied on Supreme Court decisions in Dilip Kumar and Company and PCIT vs. Wipro Ltd. to interpret deduction provisions strictly in favor of revenue. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee cannot claim fresh deductions under Chapter VI-A for the first time in the return filed u/s 153A for.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return filed in response to a notice issued u/s 153A pursuant to a search u/s 132. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd., the Tribunal held that in unabated or concluded assessments, the assessee cannot make any fresh claim of deduction in the return filed u/s 153A, as the Assessing Officer cannot make additions without incriminating material found during the search. For abated assessments, the assessee can claim all deductions by filing the return within the timeline prescribed u/s 153A, failing which deductions cannot be claimed u/s 80A. Claiming deduction u/s 80IA(4) requires filing the return before the due date u/s 139(1) and furnishing the audit report u/s 44AB, as per Section 80IA(7). The Tribunal relied on Supreme Court decisions in Dilip Kumar and Company and PCIT vs. Wipro Ltd. to interpret deduction provisions strictly in favor of revenue. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee cannot claim fresh deductions under Chapter VI-A for the first time in the return filed u/s 153A for.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.