Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Assessee received cash consideration from sale of property, deposited in bank account and utilized to purchase another property. AO accepted transaction in regular assessment without addition. Assessee contended no violation of Section 269SS as cash received after due registration of property, as per sale agreement and CBDT circulars. ITAT allowed appeal, relying on Dhinagharan case, holding cash payment made at time of registration before sub-registrar does not violate Section 269SS. No penalty leviable u/s 271D.
Assessee received cash consideration from sale of property, deposited in bank account and utilized to purchase another property. AO accepted transaction in regular assessment without addition. Assessee contended no violation of Section 269SS as cash received after due registration of property, as per sale agreement and CBDT circulars. ITAT allowed appeal, relying on Dhinagharan case, holding cash payment made at time of registration before sub-registrar does not violate Section 269SS. No penalty leviable u/s 271D.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.