Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4301 to 4320 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee received cash consideration from sale of property, deposited in bank account and utilized to purchase another property. AO accepted transaction in regular assessment without addition. Assessee contended no violation of Section 269SS as cash received after due registration of property, as per sale agreement and CBDT circulars. ITAT allowed appeal, relying on Dhinagharan case, holding cash payment made at time of registration before sub-registrar does not violate Section 269SS. No penalty leviable u/s 271D.
Assessee received cash consideration from sale of property, deposited in bank account and utilized to purchase another property. AO accepted transaction in regular assessment without addition. Assessee contended no violation of Section 269SS as cash received after due registration of property, as per sale agreement and CBDT circulars. ITAT allowed appeal, relying on Dhinagharan case, holding cash payment made at time of registration before sub-registrar does not violate Section 269SS. No penalty leviable u/s 271D.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
