Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee failed to repay a loan to M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Pvt. Ltd., leading to the auctioning of a car during the assessment year. The successful bidder in the auction made a cash payment directly to M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.'s bank account to clear the loan. The Appellate Tribunal held that since the cash payment was made by the bidder and not the assessee, the assessee cannot be penalized u/s 271E for violating section 269T's provisions regarding cash repayment of a loan. Consequently, the assessee's appeal against the penalty was allowed.
The assessee failed to repay a loan to M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Pvt. Ltd., leading to the auctioning of a car during the assessment year. The successful bidder in the auction made a cash payment directly to M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.'s bank account to clear the loan. The Appellate Tribunal held that since the cash payment was made by the bidder and not the assessee, the assessee cannot be penalized u/s 271E for violating section 269T's provisions regarding cash repayment of a loan. Consequently, the assessee's appeal against the penalty was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
