Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interests. The filing fee for increasing share capital was rightly allowed as revenue expenditure, supported by audited financials and judicial precedent. The AO examined the revised computation, disallowed deduction u/s 35ABB after due application of mind, and passed the assessment order at the originally returned income. The PCIT's revision u/s 263, deeming the AO's order erroneous and prejudicial, is unjustified and quashed. The assessee's appeal is allowed.
The AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interests. The filing fee for increasing share capital was rightly allowed as revenue expenditure, supported by audited financials and judicial precedent. The AO examined the revised computation, disallowed deduction u/s 35ABB after due application of mind, and passed the assessment order at the originally returned income. The PCIT's revision u/s 263, deeming the AO's order erroneous and prejudicial, is unjustified and quashed. The assessee's appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
