Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
The AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interests. The filing fee for increasing share capital was rightly allowed as revenue expenditure, supported by audited financials and judicial precedent. The AO examined the revised computation, disallowed deduction u/s 35ABB after due application of mind, and passed the assessment order at the originally returned income. The PCIT's revision u/s 263, deeming the AO's order erroneous and prejudicial, is unjustified and quashed. The assessee's appeal is allowed.
The AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interests. The filing fee for increasing share capital was rightly allowed as revenue expenditure, supported by audited financials and judicial precedent. The AO examined the revised computation, disallowed deduction u/s 35ABB after due application of mind, and passed the assessment order at the originally returned income. The PCIT's revision u/s 263, deeming the AO's order erroneous and prejudicial, is unjustified and quashed. The assessee's appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
