Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of assessments made u/s 153C, considering the gap between the satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer of the searched person and the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Jasjit Singh's case, which held that the first proviso to Section 153C(1) applies not only to the question of abatement but also to the date from which the six-year period is reckoned for filing returns by third parties. In the present appeals, the requisition and satisfaction note were recorded by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer on 10/11/2021 for the Assessment Year 2022-23. The 10-year outer ceiling limit prescribed in the statute must be computed backward from 31/03/2022. The assessments framed for the Assessment Years 2011-12 and 2012-13 fell beyond this 10-year period contemplated u/s 153C(1). Consequently, the Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of assessments made u/s 153C, considering the gap between the satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer of the searched person and the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Jasjit Singh's case, which held that the first proviso to Section 153C(1) applies not only to the question of abatement but also to the date from which the six-year period is reckoned for filing returns by third parties. In the present appeals, the requisition and satisfaction note were recorded by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer on 10/11/2021 for the Assessment Year 2022-23. The 10-year outer ceiling limit prescribed in the statute must be computed backward from 31/03/2022. The assessments framed for the Assessment Years 2011-12 and 2012-13 fell beyond this 10-year period contemplated u/s 153C(1). Consequently, the Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
