Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The High Court set aside the adjudication order blocking the Petitioner's credit ledger due to lack of personal hearing and violation of principles of natural justice. The adjudicating officer failed to provide reasons for sustaining the demand or interest, merely stating conclusions without addressing the Petitioner's detailed response to the show cause notice. The Court emphasized the need for reasoned orders, considering furnishing reasons as an essential concomitant of natural justice and fair play, enabling the Appellate Authority to discern the basis for the decision. The impugned order, being unreasoned and non-speaking, could not be sustained. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication, with directions to hear the Petitioner and pass a speaking order within six weeks.
The High Court set aside the adjudication order blocking the Petitioner's credit ledger due to lack of personal hearing and violation of principles of natural justice. The adjudicating officer failed to provide reasons for sustaining the demand or interest, merely stating conclusions without addressing the Petitioner's detailed response to the show cause notice. The Court emphasized the need for reasoned orders, considering furnishing reasons as an essential concomitant of natural justice and fair play, enabling the Appellate Authority to discern the basis for the decision. The impugned order, being unreasoned and non-speaking, could not be sustained. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication, with directions to hear the Petitioner and pass a speaking order within six weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
