Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the issue of provisional attachment of a bank account by the authorities u/s 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, alleging wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit. Considering the nature of allegations against the petitioner, the Court granted liberty to move for lifting the provisional attachment as per Rule 159. The petitioner was allowed to file an application for revocation within one week, and the authorities were directed to examine and dispose of such application preferably within two weeks, in accordance with the law.
The High Court addressed the issue of provisional attachment of a bank account by the authorities u/s 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, alleging wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit. Considering the nature of allegations against the petitioner, the Court granted liberty to move for lifting the provisional attachment as per Rule 159. The petitioner was allowed to file an application for revocation within one week, and the authorities were directed to examine and dispose of such application preferably within two weeks, in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
