Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Writ petition challenging order u/s 73 of WBGST/CGST Act for tax period April 2018 to March 2019 dismissed. Court found petitioner's contention of consultant's unavailability unconvincing for not responding to pre-show cause and show cause notices. As a private limited company, petitioner cannot feign ignorance. Petitioner failed to avail statutory remedy of appeal u/s 107, hence not entitled to invoke extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
Writ petition challenging order u/s 73 of WBGST/CGST Act for tax period April 2018 to March 2019 dismissed. Court found petitioner's contention of consultant's unavailability unconvincing for not responding to pre-show cause and show cause notices. As a private limited company, petitioner cannot feign ignorance. Petitioner failed to avail statutory remedy of appeal u/s 107, hence not entitled to invoke extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
