Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The guidelines provide a comprehensive framework for compounding offenses under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The key points are: 1. Compounding is permissible for specified offenses, subject to certain exclusions like anti-national/terrorist activities, offenses related to black money, benami transactions, and repeat offenders. 2. The jurisdictional Pr. CCIT/CCIT/Pr. DGIT/DGIT is the competent authority for compounding. Detailed procedures and timelines are prescribed for processing applications. 3. Compounding charges are computed based on the tax amount involved and whether it is a first or subsequent application for the same offense type. Higher charges apply for delayed applications. 4. Co-accused persons in company/HUF offenses can file separate or joint applications. The order compounds offenses for all upon payment by any one party. 5. The compounding order does not constitute admission of the offense by the applicant. 6. Detailed formats are provided for the application affidavit, checklist for processing, and orders accepting or rejecting compounding. 7. Procedures for payment of compounding charges, withdrawal of prosecution complaints/appeals, and recovery of pending demands are outlined. The guidelines aim to streamline and encourage compounding while excluding grave offenses, ensuring effective prosecution for non-compoundable cases.
The guidelines provide a comprehensive framework for compounding offenses under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The key points are: 1. Compounding is permissible for specified offenses, subject to certain exclusions like anti-national/terrorist activities, offenses related to black money, benami transactions, and repeat offenders. 2. The jurisdictional Pr. CCIT/CCIT/Pr. DGIT/DGIT is the competent authority for compounding. Detailed procedures and timelines are prescribed for processing applications. 3. Compounding charges are computed based on the tax amount involved and whether it is a first or subsequent application for the same offense type. Higher charges apply for delayed applications. 4. Co-accused persons in company/HUF offenses can file separate or joint applications. The order compounds offenses for all upon payment by any one party. 5. The compounding order does not constitute admission of the offense by the applicant. 6. Detailed formats are provided for the application affidavit, checklist for processing, and orders accepting or rejecting compounding. 7. Procedures for payment of compounding charges, withdrawal of prosecution complaints/appeals, and recovery of pending demands are outlined. The guidelines aim to streamline and encourage compounding while excluding grave offenses, ensuring effective prosecution for non-compoundable cases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.