Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court quashed the orders issued by the tax authorities after scrutiny of GST returns u/s 61, as the principles of natural justice were violated by not providing an opportunity of hearing. The petitioner inadvertently claimed input tax credit under the wrong column in GSTR-3B, which was clarified through a reply, but the authorities failed to consider it before passing the orders and recovering excess tax. Consequently, the HC set aside the orders, lifted the attachment on the petitioner's bank account, and directed the authorities to release the attachment immediately upon production of the court order, disposing of the writ petition.
The High Court quashed the orders issued by the tax authorities after scrutiny of GST returns u/s 61, as the principles of natural justice were violated by not providing an opportunity of hearing. The petitioner inadvertently claimed input tax credit under the wrong column in GSTR-3B, which was clarified through a reply, but the authorities failed to consider it before passing the orders and recovering excess tax. Consequently, the HC set aside the orders, lifted the attachment on the petitioner's bank account, and directed the authorities to release the attachment immediately upon production of the court order, disposing of the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
