Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3101 to 3120 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court quashed the orders issued by the tax authorities after scrutiny of GST returns u/s 61, as the principles of natural justice were violated by not providing an opportunity of hearing. The petitioner inadvertently claimed input tax credit under the wrong column in GSTR-3B, which was clarified through a reply, but the authorities failed to consider it before passing the orders and recovering excess tax. Consequently, the HC set aside the orders, lifted the attachment on the petitioner's bank account, and directed the authorities to release the attachment immediately upon production of the court order, disposing of the writ petition.
The High Court quashed the orders issued by the tax authorities after scrutiny of GST returns u/s 61, as the principles of natural justice were violated by not providing an opportunity of hearing. The petitioner inadvertently claimed input tax credit under the wrong column in GSTR-3B, which was clarified through a reply, but the authorities failed to consider it before passing the orders and recovering excess tax. Consequently, the HC set aside the orders, lifted the attachment on the petitioner's bank account, and directed the authorities to release the attachment immediately upon production of the court order, disposing of the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
