Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
This is a case regarding the applicability of GST exemption under Entry 3B of Notification No. 13/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 for services provided by the applicant to a local authority. The key points are: The applicant is engaged in providing 'works contract services' involving supply of goods along with services for an immovable property to Kotputli Municipal Council, a local authority. Entry 3B extends to pure services or composite supplies where the value of goods does not exceed 25%. However, Entries 3 and 3A specifically cover services provided to local authorities. Since the applicant is providing services to a local authority, Entries 3 and 3A are applicable, and there is no need to consider Entry 3B. Therefore, the exemption under Entry 3B is not applicable to the applicant for the services provided to the Kotputli Municipal Council.
This is a case regarding the applicability of GST exemption under Entry 3B of Notification No. 13/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 for services provided by the applicant to a local authority. The key points are: The applicant is engaged in providing 'works contract services' involving supply of goods along with services for an immovable property to Kotputli Municipal Council, a local authority. Entry 3B extends to pure services or composite supplies where the value of goods does not exceed 25%. However, Entries 3 and 3A specifically cover services provided to local authorities. Since the applicant is providing services to a local authority, Entries 3 and 3A are applicable, and there is no need to consider Entry 3B. Therefore, the exemption under Entry 3B is not applicable to the applicant for the services provided to the Kotputli Municipal Council.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
