Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The appellant imported parts, components, and accessories at a concessional rate of customs duty under Notification No. 50/2017-Cus dated 30.06.2017, Entry No. 512, for manufacturing Lithium-ion batteries. However, it was alleged that the imported goods were used for manufacturing power banks instead. The term "manufacture" in the notification must be interpreted considering Rule 3(e) of the IGCR Rules, 2017. A cell is a single unit that converts chemical energy into electrical energy, while a battery is a group of cells. The term "manufacture" in Rule 3(e) is satisfied when a battery emerges as a distinct product from its components, i.e., individual lithium cells and others. The exemption under Entry No. 512 is available when the imported parts and components are used in the manufacture of lithium batteries, not necessarily as the final product. Since the appellant used the imported goods to manufacture Lithium-ion batteries, which were then captively used to manufacture power banks, the appellant is entitled to the exemption under Entry No. 512. The amendment made vide Notification Nos. 02/2019-Cus and 03/2019-Cus dated 29.01.2019 manifests that before the amendment, the subject goods were exempted under Notification No.
The appellant imported parts, components, and accessories at a concessional rate of customs duty under Notification No. 50/2017-Cus dated 30.06.2017, Entry No. 512, for manufacturing Lithium-ion batteries. However, it was alleged that the imported goods were used for manufacturing power banks instead. The term "manufacture" in the notification must be interpreted considering Rule 3(e) of the IGCR Rules, 2017. A cell is a single unit that converts chemical energy into electrical energy, while a battery is a group of cells. The term "manufacture" in Rule 3(e) is satisfied when a battery emerges as a distinct product from its components, i.e., individual lithium cells and others. The exemption under Entry No. 512 is available when the imported parts and components are used in the manufacture of lithium batteries, not necessarily as the final product. Since the appellant used the imported goods to manufacture Lithium-ion batteries, which were then captively used to manufacture power banks, the appellant is entitled to the exemption under Entry No. 512. The amendment made vide Notification Nos. 02/2019-Cus and 03/2019-Cus dated 29.01.2019 manifests that before the amendment, the subject goods were exempted under Notification No.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.