Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Proceeds of crime were diverted from a sanctioned loan amount of Rs. 1530.99 crores for an unauthorized purpose, constituting a predicate offence for money laundering. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested the accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), providing reasons to believe as mandated by Section 19. The High Court upheld the arrest, ruling that the ED complied with statutory requirements by apprising the accused of reasons and grounds for arrest at the time of arrest. Non-recovery of substantial proceeds of crime necessitated the arrest. The arrest grounds were self-sufficient and valid, conforming to Section 19 of PMLA. An illegal arrest breaching Section 19 requirements would invalidate the arrest and prevent re-arrest on the same grounds, infringing constitutional rights.
Proceeds of crime were diverted from a sanctioned loan amount of Rs. 1530.99 crores for an unauthorized purpose, constituting a predicate offence for money laundering. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested the accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), providing reasons to believe as mandated by Section 19. The High Court upheld the arrest, ruling that the ED complied with statutory requirements by apprising the accused of reasons and grounds for arrest at the time of arrest. Non-recovery of substantial proceeds of crime necessitated the arrest. The arrest grounds were self-sufficient and valid, conforming to Section 19 of PMLA. An illegal arrest breaching Section 19 requirements would invalidate the arrest and prevent re-arrest on the same grounds, infringing constitutional rights.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
