Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The appellant contested the service tax demand on trade discounts and incentives received from Tata Motors Limited for promoting or marketing vehicles. The Tribunal held that the transaction between the appellant and Tata Motors Limited was a pure sale and purchase of cars, with the trade discount deducted from the sale value. The Tribunal reiterated that trade discounts or incentives given by car manufacturers to dealers in the course of vehicle sales do not constitute a service, and hence, no service tax is payable. Even under the negative list regime post-Finance Act, 1944, the sale of goods through transfer of title is excluded from service tax. Relying on a Division Bench decision in Infinium Motors case, the Tribunal ruled that trade incentives or discounts are not liable to service tax as they are connected to the purchase and sale of vehicles, not any service. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal.
The appellant contested the service tax demand on trade discounts and incentives received from Tata Motors Limited for promoting or marketing vehicles. The Tribunal held that the transaction between the appellant and Tata Motors Limited was a pure sale and purchase of cars, with the trade discount deducted from the sale value. The Tribunal reiterated that trade discounts or incentives given by car manufacturers to dealers in the course of vehicle sales do not constitute a service, and hence, no service tax is payable. Even under the negative list regime post-Finance Act, 1944, the sale of goods through transfer of title is excluded from service tax. Relying on a Division Bench decision in Infinium Motors case, the Tribunal ruled that trade incentives or discounts are not liable to service tax as they are connected to the purchase and sale of vehicles, not any service. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.