Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Disciplinary action against a Resolution Professional (RP) for contravention of provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and lack of due diligence. RP failed to verify the Resolution Plan, intimate claims, and address specific queries, violating Sections 30(2)(b) and (e), 208(2)(a) and (e) of IBC. RP did not object to the proposal by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) which included comments and legal analysis terming an arbitration award in favor of a claimant as void. Despite legal opinion advising against such comments, RP failed to take cognizance. RP's inaction on indicating precise admitted claim amount violated Regulations 13(2)(a) and (d). The Disciplinary Committee found sufficient basis for issuing show cause notice and suspending RP's registration for one year based on NCLAT's observations of RP's failure in duty. Suspension period within Disciplinary Committee's jurisdiction u/s 220 of IBC. No interference warranted in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition dismissed.
Disciplinary action against a Resolution Professional (RP) for contravention of provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and lack of due diligence. RP failed to verify the Resolution Plan, intimate claims, and address specific queries, violating Sections 30(2)(b) and (e), 208(2)(a) and (e) of IBC. RP did not object to the proposal by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) which included comments and legal analysis terming an arbitration award in favor of a claimant as void. Despite legal opinion advising against such comments, RP failed to take cognizance. RP's inaction on indicating precise admitted claim amount violated Regulations 13(2)(a) and (d). The Disciplinary Committee found sufficient basis for issuing show cause notice and suspending RP's registration for one year based on NCLAT's observations of RP's failure in duty. Suspension period within Disciplinary Committee's jurisdiction u/s 220 of IBC. No interference warranted in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
