Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The Appellate Tribunal concurred with the Mumbai Tribunal's order in M/s Pooja Marketing, which comprehensively dealt with all aspects, facts, and applicable case laws. The bench not only considered the validity of revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 but also decided the issue on merits in favor of the assessee. The case law in CIT vs. Dr. M.A.M. Ramaswamy was distinguished by the learned Senior Counsel in written submissions, which was deliberated upon and found concurrence. No distinguishing feature or reversal of the Mumbai Tribunal's decision by higher judicial authorities was shown. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal after elaborately dealing with the issue on merits.
The Appellate Tribunal concurred with the Mumbai Tribunal's order in M/s Pooja Marketing, which comprehensively dealt with all aspects, facts, and applicable case laws. The bench not only considered the validity of revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 but also decided the issue on merits in favor of the assessee. The case law in CIT vs. Dr. M.A.M. Ramaswamy was distinguished by the learned Senior Counsel in written submissions, which was deliberated upon and found concurrence. No distinguishing feature or reversal of the Mumbai Tribunal's decision by higher judicial authorities was shown. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal after elaborately dealing with the issue on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
