Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1181 to 1200 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rejected due to non-fulfillment of pre-import conditions for goods imported under Advance Authorizations. Initially, IGST exemption was wrongly availed, but payment was made later. The pre-import condition in the notification was upheld as valid by the Supreme Court. The appellant admitted to not fulfilling the pre-import conditions, rendering them ineligible for IGST exemption. The interest liability on delayed IGST payment was automatic. The Bombay High Court's decision on interest refund for additional customs duty did not apply to IGST. The CESTAT dismissed the appeal, concluding that the refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rightly rejected.
Refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rejected due to non-fulfillment of pre-import conditions for goods imported under Advance Authorizations. Initially, IGST exemption was wrongly availed, but payment was made later. The pre-import condition in the notification was upheld as valid by the Supreme Court. The appellant admitted to not fulfilling the pre-import conditions, rendering them ineligible for IGST exemption. The interest liability on delayed IGST payment was automatic. The Bombay High Court's decision on interest refund for additional customs duty did not apply to IGST. The CESTAT dismissed the appeal, concluding that the refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rightly rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
