Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rejected due to non-fulfillment of pre-import conditions for goods imported under Advance Authorizations. Initially, IGST exemption was wrongly availed, but payment was made later. The pre-import condition in the notification was upheld as valid by the Supreme Court. The appellant admitted to not fulfilling the pre-import conditions, rendering them ineligible for IGST exemption. The interest liability on delayed IGST payment was automatic. The Bombay High Court's decision on interest refund for additional customs duty did not apply to IGST. The CESTAT dismissed the appeal, concluding that the refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rightly rejected.
Refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rejected due to non-fulfillment of pre-import conditions for goods imported under Advance Authorizations. Initially, IGST exemption was wrongly availed, but payment was made later. The pre-import condition in the notification was upheld as valid by the Supreme Court. The appellant admitted to not fulfilling the pre-import conditions, rendering them ineligible for IGST exemption. The interest liability on delayed IGST payment was automatic. The Bombay High Court's decision on interest refund for additional customs duty did not apply to IGST. The CESTAT dismissed the appeal, concluding that the refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rightly rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
