Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Error apparent on record rectified by allowing Revenue's appeal instead of wrongly dismissing it, as logical conclusion of upholding Revenue's contentions. Rectification limited to correcting error on record, not re-hearing matter. Apex Court's guidelines on rectifying apparent errors followed. Request to reconsider monetary limits post-disposal not entertained, as it would reopen decided matters. CESTAT's final order dated 18.03.2024 disposing appeal upheld, no other errors found.
Error apparent on record rectified by allowing Revenue's appeal instead of wrongly dismissing it, as logical conclusion of upholding Revenue's contentions. Rectification limited to correcting error on record, not re-hearing matter. Apex Court's guidelines on rectifying apparent errors followed. Request to reconsider monetary limits post-disposal not entertained, as it would reopen decided matters. CESTAT's final order dated 18.03.2024 disposing appeal upheld, no other errors found.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
