Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The interim moratorium u/s 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) applies only to the specific debt for which Section 95 proceedings have been initiated against a personal guarantor. It does not extend to other debts or properties of the personal guarantor or entities they are associated with. The moratorium prohibits other creditors from initiating legal action regarding the specific debt, but does not bar creditors from enforcing their rights against separate properties or entities. The IBC provisions take precedence over other laws u/s 238. In this case, the moratorium covers only the personal guarantee and does not restrain the creditor from auctioning partnership firm assets, as the firm is a separate entity from the personal guarantor. The appeal against allowing the auction was dismissed.
The interim moratorium u/s 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) applies only to the specific debt for which Section 95 proceedings have been initiated against a personal guarantor. It does not extend to other debts or properties of the personal guarantor or entities they are associated with. The moratorium prohibits other creditors from initiating legal action regarding the specific debt, but does not bar creditors from enforcing their rights against separate properties or entities. The IBC provisions take precedence over other laws u/s 238. In this case, the moratorium covers only the personal guarantee and does not restrain the creditor from auctioning partnership firm assets, as the firm is a separate entity from the personal guarantor. The appeal against allowing the auction was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
