Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1221 to 1240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case pertains to the interpretation of amended provisions of Sections 35F and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding eligibility for interest on pre-deposit amounts. The appellant had deposited the entire pre-deposit amount on specific dates in 2015, after the commencement of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014, on 06.08.2014. The proviso to Section 35F categorizes pre-deposit amounts into two categories: (i) deposited prior to 06.08.2014 and (ii) deposited post 06.08.2014. For amounts deposited post 06.08.2014, the amended Section 35FF applies, while for amounts deposited prior to 06.08.2014, the erstwhile Section 35FF applies. The settled principle of statutory interpretation requires interpreting the statute in accordance with the words used. The CBEC circular clarified that where an appeal is decided in favor of the assessee, they shall be entitled to a refund of the deposited amount along with interest from the date of deposit to the date of refund u/s 35FF. The Tribunal held that since the circular was issued without qualification, subordinate authorities cannot introduce qualifications, and allowed the appeal.
The case pertains to the interpretation of amended provisions of Sections 35F and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding eligibility for interest on pre-deposit amounts. The appellant had deposited the entire pre-deposit amount on specific dates in 2015, after the commencement of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014, on 06.08.2014. The proviso to Section 35F categorizes pre-deposit amounts into two categories: (i) deposited prior to 06.08.2014 and (ii) deposited post 06.08.2014. For amounts deposited post 06.08.2014, the amended Section 35FF applies, while for amounts deposited prior to 06.08.2014, the erstwhile Section 35FF applies. The settled principle of statutory interpretation requires interpreting the statute in accordance with the words used. The CBEC circular clarified that where an appeal is decided in favor of the assessee, they shall be entitled to a refund of the deposited amount along with interest from the date of deposit to the date of refund u/s 35FF. The Tribunal held that since the circular was issued without qualification, subordinate authorities cannot introduce qualifications, and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
