Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Interest taxability on internal bank placements: payment-to-self receipts escaped tax, while bad-debt write-off and refund interest were addressed.
    Recorded satisfaction and corroborative proof are essential for section 271DA penalty on alleged cash-receipt violations.
    BOT road amortization must follow actual concession end date; debatable depreciation claim could not sustain penalty
    Section 80P deduction on bank-deposit interest follows when a co-operative credit society parks business funds temporarily.
    Customs supervision charges recoverable on Merchant Over Time basis when officers were used only part-day.
    Related-party import valuation: transaction value rejected, but Rule 8 revaluation largely failed under customs valuation rules
    Customs broker liability for export overvaluation rejected where KYC compliance, mandatory timelines and duplicate penalty all failed.
    June 26, 2026   Case Laws Money Laundering
    Quashing criminal mining and PMLA proceedings requires trial on disputed evidence, as laundering stands distinct.
    June 26, 2026   Case Laws Money Laundering
    PMLA initiation requires statutory satisfaction; predicate offence alone cannot compel ECIR registration or mandamus by a writ court
    June 26, 2026   Case Laws Money Laundering
    PMLA attachment over PACL assets yields to a special investor restitution framework and cannot continue in parallel.
    Minimum Average Balance is a contractual condition, not taxable consideration, and service tax notices were quashed.
    Service Tax on Factory Premises: PSU status gave no exemption, but limitation defeated the entire demand.
    Section 9D and Section 36B safeguards defeated clandestine removal allegations where statements and computer records were inadmissible
    Delegated GST notifications cannot exceed recommendations; added "enforceable right" wording is invalid and ratification cannot cure it.
    Writ challenge to GST show cause notice fails where statutory appeal is available and no natural justice breach is shown
    Speaking order requirement in GST registration cancellation: vague notices and absent reasons violate natural justice and statutory procedure.
    Reasoned penalty order on fake invoices sustained where material showed partners' knowledge and consent under GST.
    Non-consideration of an applicable tax circular justified interference and remand in an input tax credit dispute.
    Ex gratia informant reward rests on discretionary guidelines and is not reopened in writ absent arbitrariness.
    Coercive tax recovery stayed pending appeal after corrected Form-3CD figures and expeditious appellate disposal
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Central Excise

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT...

Tribunal Rules CENVAT Credit Valid for Pre-2014 Invoices, Affirms Credit for Input Services Outside Factory.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Central Excise October 17, 2024 Case Laws AT
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 46,27,417/- for the period 03.12.2005 to 31.03.2012 on input services utilized at salt pans for procuring salt, a raw material for soda ash production. The department rejected the credit on the grounds that it was availed beyond one year from the date of invoice, relying on Sections 11A and 11B of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. However, these sections do not prescribe any time limit for availing credit. The amendment introducing the one-year time limit was made on 11.07.2014, after the relevant period. Relying on the Roquette Riddhi Siddhi case, the Tribunal held that credit can be availed even after one year for invoices issued before 01.09.2014. Regarding the second issue, the Tribunal, relying on precedents like Parry Engineering, held that credit cannot be denied merely because the input service was utilized outside the factory premises, as long as it has a nexus with manufacturing activity. Since salt procurement from salt pans is directly related to soda ash manufacturing, the appellant is entitled to the CENVAT credit on such input services.

Topics

Acts Income Tax