Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Unexplained jewellery additions fail where family customs, gifts, bills and bank records support reasonable possession and ownership.
    Transfer pricing adjustment on interest to an associated enterprise remanded after admission of additional evidence.
    CUP benchmarking accepts public commodity broker quotations where reliability is unchallenged, leading to deletion of transfer pricing adjustment.
    Jurisdictional challenge to reassessment and unsupported reduction of accommodation-entry commission estimate were rejected by the tribunal.
    Development agreement possession for limited construction purposes did not create a taxable transfer; capital gains addition deleted.
    Pre-primary education qualifies as charitable education, and alleged section 13 issues cannot by themselves deny registration.
    Unexplained investment penalty under section 271AAC upheld where quantum finding stood final and statutory immunity conditions were unmet.
    MAP resolution for transfer pricing takes effect after withdrawal of the resolved appeal ground under treaty rules.
    Transfer pricing for software subscription resale: Berry ratio upheld for a limited-risk distributor under TNMM.
    Repeal and saving in drawback law barred recovery, while exported goods could not be confiscated or penalised.
    Country of origin proof prevailed where unverified electronic evidence and denied cross-examination failed to displace documentary records.
    Molybdenum classification turns on functional transformation, with cut and curved lamp parts treated as other articles of molybdenum.
    Customs valuation of second-hand machinery must follow statutory rules; unsupported redetermination, confiscation and penalties were set aside.
    MEIS scrip validity at import date protects duty benefit despite later DGFT modification.
    Duty demand on alleged marble diversion fails where statements were inadmissible and post-import breach could not sustain penalties.
    Related party control and cooperative status in anti-dumping review turned on pledge security and relevant dumping data.
    Extended limitation not invocable where bona fide belief and no suppression were found in customs classification dispute.
    Interim moratorium and continuing guarantee: later insolvency filing was maintainable, and personal guarantor liability continued.
    Belated CIRP claim cannot reopen an approved resolution plan where the claimant knew of the process and treated settlement as final.
    Repayment plan requirement under personal guarantor insolvency upheld; one-time settlement offers cannot replace statutory compliance.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Central Excise

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT...

Tribunal Rules CENVAT Credit Valid for Pre-2014 Invoices, Affirms Credit for Input Services Outside Factory.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Central Excise October 17, 2024 Case Laws AT
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 46,27,417/- for the period 03.12.2005 to 31.03.2012 on input services utilized at salt pans for procuring salt, a raw material for soda ash production. The department rejected the credit on the grounds that it was availed beyond one year from the date of invoice, relying on Sections 11A and 11B of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. However, these sections do not prescribe any time limit for availing credit. The amendment introducing the one-year time limit was made on 11.07.2014, after the relevant period. Relying on the Roquette Riddhi Siddhi case, the Tribunal held that credit can be availed even after one year for invoices issued before 01.09.2014. Regarding the second issue, the Tribunal, relying on precedents like Parry Engineering, held that credit cannot be denied merely because the input service was utilized outside the factory premises, as long as it has a nexus with manufacturing activity. Since salt procurement from salt pans is directly related to soda ash manufacturing, the appellant is entitled to the CENVAT credit on such input services.

Topics

Acts Income Tax