Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Abated search assessments permit fresh claims; lease rentals, section 14A relief, and no notional ALV on unsold stock-in-trade.
    Recorded satisfaction in assessment order is mandatory before penalty under section 271D can be sustained.
    Exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) follows binding prior tribunal orders despite later administrative error
    Telecom tax adjustments: Tribunal deleted multiple disallowances, allowed spectrum amortisation, and rejected section 14A in absence of exempt income.
    Make available test under India-US DTAA failed for manpower support services, so fees for technical services addition was deleted.
    Delayed Form 10IC treated as procedural lapse where option for concessional tax regime was already exercised in return.
    Reasonable cause under section 273B protected the assessee from TDS default penalty under section 272A(2)(g).
    Redevelopment hardship compensation held to be a non-taxable capital receipt; tax on additional carpet area set aside for lack of notice.
    Transfer pricing comparability turns on turnover, segmental data and functional profile in software development and marketing support services.
    Turnover-based comparability and AE-only transfer pricing adjustment shape ITES benchmarking and withholding tax review.
    Transfer pricing of ECB interest requires year-specific benchmarking on correct facts; RBI ceiling is only corroborative, not determinative.
    False shipping bills and EPCG fraud justified penalty, but proportionality required reduction of the customs penalties.
    Assessable value and classification of computer goods rejected where no evidence supported misdeclaration or incomplete system treatment.
    Additional evidence under tribunal rules must be tested for necessity or sufficient cause, not merely late filing.
    Declared export value cannot be rejected without recorded reasons or prescribed valuation procedure; assessment must follow transaction value.
    Equitable meaning of "member" in oppression and mismanagement petitions allows remedy despite absent register entry.
    Class voting, veil piercing and exclusion of penal dues shaped recovery under resolution plans for stalled projects.
    Corporate guarantee liability limited to equity and shortfall obligations; Section 7 insolvency claim barred by Section 10A.
    Operational debt in joint venture supply arrangement upheld; Section 10A bar and pre-existing dispute objections failed.
    Commercial wisdom in resolution plan evaluation upheld; post-submission addendum rejected as impermissible modification.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Central Excise

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT...

Tribunal Rules CENVAT Credit Valid for Pre-2014 Invoices, Affirms Credit for Input Services Outside Factory.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Central Excise October 17, 2024 Case Laws AT
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 46,27,417/- for the period 03.12.2005 to 31.03.2012 on input services utilized at salt pans for procuring salt, a raw material for soda ash production. The department rejected the credit on the grounds that it was availed beyond one year from the date of invoice, relying on Sections 11A and 11B of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. However, these sections do not prescribe any time limit for availing credit. The amendment introducing the one-year time limit was made on 11.07.2014, after the relevant period. Relying on the Roquette Riddhi Siddhi case, the Tribunal held that credit can be availed even after one year for invoices issued before 01.09.2014. Regarding the second issue, the Tribunal, relying on precedents like Parry Engineering, held that credit cannot be denied merely because the input service was utilized outside the factory premises, as long as it has a nexus with manufacturing activity. Since salt procurement from salt pans is directly related to soda ash manufacturing, the appellant is entitled to the CENVAT credit on such input services.

Topics

Acts Income Tax