Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Bluetooth headset classification under CTI 8518 30 00 upheld; extended limitation and penalty under section 114A set aside.
    Natural justice and transaction value govern ad valorem export duty; moisture variation alone cannot displace declared sale price.
    Provisional release conditions for seized imported goods cannot exceed what is needed to secure duty and interest.
    Rule 2(a) does not treat unassembled elevator parts as complete lifts when essential components are missing.
    Sanctioned scheme of arrangement binds creditors and bars separate suits over claims assigned under the settlement framework.
    Condonation of delay in a first appeal on facts and law granted where the appellate remedy was treated as a valuable right.
    Personal guarantor liability survives resolution plan approval and limitation objection fails in Section 95 insolvency proceedings.
    Third-party mortgage does not create financial debt without disbursement; claim can still be admitted as an other creditor.
    Preferential transaction analysis under insolvency law upheld only for the related-party creditor transfer; CoC approval was not required.
    Pre-existing dispute under insolvency law failed where the debtor had already crystallised and acknowledged the balance payable.
    Statutory first charge and deemed relinquishment shaped treatment of VAT and CST dues in liquidation.
    Simultaneous insolvency and post-liquidation settlement limits upheld, with liquidation sustained despite objections and absent resolution plans.
    Section 19 assistance under insolvency law cannot compel a former statutory auditor absent possession or proven necessity.
    Liquidation waterfall under insolvency law prevails over state tax claims, barring treatment of tax dues as secured debt.
    Inter-divisional services within the same organisation were held outside service tax, with revenue neutrality defeating the demand.
    Inter-State sales proof and assessment jurisdiction upheld; limitation, cross-examination, and penalty objections were rejected.
    Approved resolution plan extinguishes pre-CIRP income-tax dues, making later reassessment and demand notice unsustainable.
    Retraction-based commission additions and time-barred reassessment fail without corroboration, threshold compliance or verified electronic evidence.
    Section 54F exemption cannot be denied for technical non-deposit in the Capital Gain Account Scheme when house investment is otherwise complete.
    Penalty initiation requires recorded satisfaction in the assessment order; separate notice could not sustain section 271D penalty.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Central Excise

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT...

Tribunal Rules CENVAT Credit Valid for Pre-2014 Invoices, Affirms Credit for Input Services Outside Factory.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Central Excise October 17, 2024 Case Laws AT
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 46,27,417/- for the period 03.12.2005 to 31.03.2012 on input services utilized at salt pans for procuring salt, a raw material for soda ash production. The department rejected the credit on the grounds that it was availed beyond one year from the date of invoice, relying on Sections 11A and 11B of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. However, these sections do not prescribe any time limit for availing credit. The amendment introducing the one-year time limit was made on 11.07.2014, after the relevant period. Relying on the Roquette Riddhi Siddhi case, the Tribunal held that credit can be availed even after one year for invoices issued before 01.09.2014. Regarding the second issue, the Tribunal, relying on precedents like Parry Engineering, held that credit cannot be denied merely because the input service was utilized outside the factory premises, as long as it has a nexus with manufacturing activity. Since salt procurement from salt pans is directly related to soda ash manufacturing, the appellant is entitled to the CENVAT credit on such input services.

Topics

Acts Income Tax