Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Defective notice format, rejection of books, and unexplained cash deposits were addressed through technical and remand-based tax rulings.
    Employee benefit, share premium, ESOP and subsidiary loss claims turn on evidence, valuation and commercial expediency
    Charitable trust taxed at normal slab rates where trustees had no income share and public-benefit activities were involved.
    Revision under section 263 requires error and prejudice; claimed deductions and losses were upheld on lawful assessment and supporting records.
    Jurisdiction transfer under section 127 rendered reassessment void ab initio when the original officer acted without authority.
    Specific tariff classification for n-Hexane prevailed over motor spirit treatment, with Chapter 29 classification upheld.
    Customs investigation communication cannot replace adjudication; liability must be by show cause notice and final proceedings
    Customs valuation based only on NIDB data was held unsustainable, and enhanced duty payment did not bar appeal.
    Steamer agent penalty and retained onboard cargo confiscation rejected for lack of mens rea and import character
    Zircon sand classified as concentrate, exemption denied, duty upheld, cross-examination challenge rejected, and penalty set aside.
    Pre-CIRP security deposit adjustment and finality of an approved resolution plan barred reopening settled claims.
    Limited interference with resolution plans where claims remain disputed and contingent; recall of an implemented plan was refused.
    Limitation under the Insolvency Code runs from pronouncement, and delay beyond the outer condonable period cannot be excused.
    Substantial question of law saves departmental appeal; Barauni terminal facility treated as independent storage and warehousing service.
    Industrial policy electricity concession limited to new units; retrospective clarification excluded expanded existing enterprises from Clause 16(a).
    Power of attorney complaint in cheque dishonour case upheld; no failure of justice shown, but sentence was reduced.
    Case briefing and file management instructions issued to ensure effective Supreme Court matter handling and ASG support.
    GST appellate filing procedure tightened with committee review, authorization steps, and online defect-cure timelines for departmental cases.
    Transit State GST powers allow inspection only; detention and penalty cannot be imposed without tax incidence or local supply.
    Parallel GST proceedings barred when Central and State authorities overlap on the same contravention; only one may proceed.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Central Excise

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT...

Tribunal Rules CENVAT Credit Valid for Pre-2014 Invoices, Affirms Credit for Input Services Outside Factory.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Central Excise October 17, 2024 Case Laws AT
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 46,27,417/- for the period 03.12.2005 to 31.03.2012 on input services utilized at salt pans for procuring salt, a raw material for soda ash production. The department rejected the credit on the grounds that it was availed beyond one year from the date of invoice, relying on Sections 11A and 11B of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. However, these sections do not prescribe any time limit for availing credit. The amendment introducing the one-year time limit was made on 11.07.2014, after the relevant period. Relying on the Roquette Riddhi Siddhi case, the Tribunal held that credit can be availed even after one year for invoices issued before 01.09.2014. Regarding the second issue, the Tribunal, relying on precedents like Parry Engineering, held that credit cannot be denied merely because the input service was utilized outside the factory premises, as long as it has a nexus with manufacturing activity. Since salt procurement from salt pans is directly related to soda ash manufacturing, the appellant is entitled to the CENVAT credit on such input services.

Topics

Acts Income Tax