Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner was unaware of the proceedings culminating in the order, which related to a mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A. The court permitted the petitioner to submit a reply to the show cause notice after remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand, in the interest of justice, to contest the tax demand on merits. The petition was disposed of on this condition.
The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner was unaware of the proceedings culminating in the order, which related to a mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A. The court permitted the petitioner to submit a reply to the show cause notice after remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand, in the interest of justice, to contest the tax demand on merits. The petition was disposed of on this condition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
