Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and cross-checking income against Form 26AS/16A. The AO cannot go beyond this mandate. The assessee made a fresh claim for deduction of prior period expenses and CSR expenses, which was disallowed u/s 37(1) as it was not claimed in the original return. The assessee appealed, but the Tribunal observed that the case laws cited pertain to fresh claims in regular assessment, not preliminary assessment u/s 143(1). The assessee received an intimation u/s 143(1) accepting the return, and the time for revision had elapsed. The Tribunal held that the assessee filed the appeal without any grievance, as the AO accepted the return. Fresh claims can be genuine and traceable from the return or debatable issues requiring verification. The remedy for fresh claims lies with administrative officers or the Board, not appellate authorities. If the Board rejects the application, the remedy is through writ proceedings.
The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and cross-checking income against Form 26AS/16A. The AO cannot go beyond this mandate. The assessee made a fresh claim for deduction of prior period expenses and CSR expenses, which was disallowed u/s 37(1) as it was not claimed in the original return. The assessee appealed, but the Tribunal observed that the case laws cited pertain to fresh claims in regular assessment, not preliminary assessment u/s 143(1). The assessee received an intimation u/s 143(1) accepting the return, and the time for revision had elapsed. The Tribunal held that the assessee filed the appeal without any grievance, as the AO accepted the return. Fresh claims can be genuine and traceable from the return or debatable issues requiring verification. The remedy for fresh claims lies with administrative officers or the Board, not appellate authorities. If the Board rejects the application, the remedy is through writ proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.