Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellant's claim for stamp duty was filed belatedly, around 30 months after the public notice, without any plausible reason for the delay. The Appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the belated filing of the claim. The Resolution Plan had already been approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority, taking into account the commercial wisdom and haircut for all stakeholders, including government dues. The Resolution Plan was implemented by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA). The Appellate Tribunal found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it, as the Resolution Plan had been approved much earlier than the Appellant's claim submission, and the intended haircut was accepted by all stakeholders, including the Appellant's dues.
The Appellant's claim for stamp duty was filed belatedly, around 30 months after the public notice, without any plausible reason for the delay. The Appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the belated filing of the claim. The Resolution Plan had already been approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority, taking into account the commercial wisdom and haircut for all stakeholders, including government dues. The Resolution Plan was implemented by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA). The Appellate Tribunal found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it, as the Resolution Plan had been approved much earlier than the Appellant's claim submission, and the intended haircut was accepted by all stakeholders, including the Appellant's dues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
