Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The court addressed the issue of condonation of delay in filing an application and dismissal of an appeal on the ground of suppression of material facts regarding the cancellation of GST registration. The court referred to the Supreme Court's observation in Arunima Baruah case, which held that suppression must be of a material fact relevant for determining the lis or granting relief. The court found that while the fact of fresh registration was relevant, it was not material enough to affect the determination of the lis between the parties. Consequently, the High Court order dismissing the appeal could not be sustained, and the writ petition was allowed.
The court addressed the issue of condonation of delay in filing an application and dismissal of an appeal on the ground of suppression of material facts regarding the cancellation of GST registration. The court referred to the Supreme Court's observation in Arunima Baruah case, which held that suppression must be of a material fact relevant for determining the lis or granting relief. The court found that while the fact of fresh registration was relevant, it was not material enough to affect the determination of the lis between the parties. Consequently, the High Court order dismissing the appeal could not be sustained, and the writ petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
