Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Legal status of the assessee as a State or an agent of the State, based on Article 289 of the Constitution of India. It analyzes whether the assessee's activities are akin to those of the State, making it eligible for non-taxability. The assessee claimed deduction u/s 57 against interest income earned on fixed deposits with banks, offered under the head "income from other sources." The Tribunal applied the tests laid down by the Supreme Court in the Som Prakash Rekhi case to determine if the assessee falls within the term "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution. Agreeing that the assessee is an instrumentality/agent of the State, the Tribunal held that its interest income on fixed deposits is not chargeable to tax. Article 289(2) provides an exception for income derived from trade or business, but since the interest income was assessed under "income from other sources," this exception was deemed inapplicable. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Legal status of the assessee as a State or an agent of the State, based on Article 289 of the Constitution of India. It analyzes whether the assessee's activities are akin to those of the State, making it eligible for non-taxability. The assessee claimed deduction u/s 57 against interest income earned on fixed deposits with banks, offered under the head "income from other sources." The Tribunal applied the tests laid down by the Supreme Court in the Som Prakash Rekhi case to determine if the assessee falls within the term "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution. Agreeing that the assessee is an instrumentality/agent of the State, the Tribunal held that its interest income on fixed deposits is not chargeable to tax. Article 289(2) provides an exception for income derived from trade or business, but since the interest income was assessed under "income from other sources," this exception was deemed inapplicable. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.