Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT upheld the denial of CENVAT credit on inputs used for laying foundations or making support structures for capital goods, as per the revised definition of 'inputs' and 'capital goods' under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, for the period from 01.04.2011 to 31.03.2015. The denial of credit on Earth Excavation Works, being civil work excluded from the definition of 'input service' from 01.04.2011, was also upheld. However, credit on Erection, Commission, and Installation services used within the factory premises was allowed. The credit denial on Road Works inside the factory, being a civil structure excluded from 'input services', was upheld. The CESTAT approved the eligible CENVAT credit of Rs. 5.20 crores on structural steel items used for manufacturing capital goods, as verified by the Commissioner based on documents and Chartered Engineer's certificates. Since the entire demand, interest, and 25% penalty were paid within 30 days, the penalty u/s 11AC was set aside.
The CESTAT upheld the denial of CENVAT credit on inputs used for laying foundations or making support structures for capital goods, as per the revised definition of 'inputs' and 'capital goods' under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, for the period from 01.04.2011 to 31.03.2015. The denial of credit on Earth Excavation Works, being civil work excluded from the definition of 'input service' from 01.04.2011, was also upheld. However, credit on Erection, Commission, and Installation services used within the factory premises was allowed. The credit denial on Road Works inside the factory, being a civil structure excluded from 'input services', was upheld. The CESTAT approved the eligible CENVAT credit of Rs. 5.20 crores on structural steel items used for manufacturing capital goods, as verified by the Commissioner based on documents and Chartered Engineer's certificates. Since the entire demand, interest, and 25% penalty were paid within 30 days, the penalty u/s 11AC was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.