Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Protective addition made by Assessing Officer was not sustainable as substantive addition did not survive in concluded assessment proceedings of related party. CIT(A) rightly deleted protective addition as per settled law that if substantive addition does not survive, protective addition also does not survive, as held in Pr. CIT (Central)-2 vs. Electrical and Electronic India Ltd. Revenue's appeal dismissed as no interference warranted with CIT(A)'s order deleting protective addition in absence of incriminating material and substantive addition in related party's case.
Protective addition made by Assessing Officer was not sustainable as substantive addition did not survive in concluded assessment proceedings of related party. CIT(A) rightly deleted protective addition as per settled law that if substantive addition does not survive, protective addition also does not survive, as held in Pr. CIT (Central)-2 vs. Electrical and Electronic India Ltd. Revenue's appeal dismissed as no interference warranted with CIT(A)'s order deleting protective addition in absence of incriminating material and substantive addition in related party's case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.