Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Protective addition made by Assessing Officer was not sustainable as substantive addition did not survive in concluded assessment proceedings of related party. CIT(A) rightly deleted protective addition as per settled law that if substantive addition does not survive, protective addition also does not survive, as held in Pr. CIT (Central)-2 vs. Electrical and Electronic India Ltd. Revenue's appeal dismissed as no interference warranted with CIT(A)'s order deleting protective addition in absence of incriminating material and substantive addition in related party's case.
Protective addition made by Assessing Officer was not sustainable as substantive addition did not survive in concluded assessment proceedings of related party. CIT(A) rightly deleted protective addition as per settled law that if substantive addition does not survive, protective addition also does not survive, as held in Pr. CIT (Central)-2 vs. Electrical and Electronic India Ltd. Revenue's appeal dismissed as no interference warranted with CIT(A)'s order deleting protective addition in absence of incriminating material and substantive addition in related party's case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.