Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The High Court examined the recovery of wrongly availed credit with penalty for wrongful availment during transition to GST regime. The petitioner's branches were not registered, and there was no correlation between invoices and claims made. The Court analyzed the registration status u/r 9 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, which allows exemption granted through a 2010 notification. The petitioner produced a centralized registration certificate covering various branches. The correlation between claims and invoices was remanded to the original authority for verification after setting aside the orders. The authorities were directed to determine credit eligibility after verifying branch registration coverage. The writ petition was disposed of through remand.
The High Court examined the recovery of wrongly availed credit with penalty for wrongful availment during transition to GST regime. The petitioner's branches were not registered, and there was no correlation between invoices and claims made. The Court analyzed the registration status u/r 9 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, which allows exemption granted through a 2010 notification. The petitioner produced a centralized registration certificate covering various branches. The correlation between claims and invoices was remanded to the original authority for verification after setting aside the orders. The authorities were directed to determine credit eligibility after verifying branch registration coverage. The writ petition was disposed of through remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
