Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Non-service of show cause notice violated principles of natural justice. Respondent imposed tax liability without providing opportunity and documents to petitioner for defense. Court remanded matter to respondent for fresh consideration after petitioner pays 10% of disputed tax amount, setting aside earlier order to maintain consistency with previous cases allowing petitioner to present defense. Petition allowed by way of remand for reconsideration after partial tax payment by petitioner.
Non-service of show cause notice violated principles of natural justice. Respondent imposed tax liability without providing opportunity and documents to petitioner for defense. Court remanded matter to respondent for fresh consideration after petitioner pays 10% of disputed tax amount, setting aside earlier order to maintain consistency with previous cases allowing petitioner to present defense. Petition allowed by way of remand for reconsideration after partial tax payment by petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.